Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Running/Encyclopedia Dramatica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy keep due to the nominator's  misunderstanding. The cited guideline explains that userspace "is not intended to indefinitely archive your preferred version of disputed or previously deleted content," which is not what is occurring here. (The page's creator has explicitly advised editors to refrain from inserting content pertaining to the dispute.) As quoted below, it also states that "pages kept in userspace should not be designed to functionally substitute for articles or Wikipedia space pages," but if you read the subsequent text, it's clear that this is referring to the practice of directing readers to the page as though it's part of the encyclopedia. That userpages "can be used as a development ground for generating new content" is stated in the very same paragraph, and this is a particularly appropriate instance (given the fact that the article has been nominated for deletion and users are unable to edit it to do an unrelated dispute). —David Levy 23:03, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

User:Running/Encyclopedia Dramatica
Obvious attempt to subvert the Full protection placed per ArbCom clarification. Already exists in the appropriate namespace Encyclopedia Dramatica. Per User_page. Inapropriate use of userspace during a content dispute. "pages kept in userspace should not be designed to functionally substitute for articles or Wikipedia space pages".-- Hu12 (talk) 22:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * delete. per my nom. Articles talk page is sufficient to make editprotected changes.--Hu12 (talk) 22:37, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * comment - oh, I didn't know this kind of pages are not permitted on WP and I will delete it myself, if it's a problem... I am very sorry if I disrupted the content dispute, I just thought it's better to actually make the page editable. --Have a nice day. Running 22:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.