Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Running4uni/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. WP:SOFTDELETE  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 20:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

User:Running4uni/sandbox

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Abandoned userspace draft (last edited 29 May 2020) that duplicates the topic of Male infertility crisis. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 20:35, 31 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Soft delete per WP:UP. It looks like User:Running4uni accidentally created the content fork in his sandbox in March 2020, before discovering the article on 28 March 2020, and on that day he did whole-article sandboxing and thereafter (for the rest of the day) edited his contributions into the article. Normally as a rule I would say “delete per WP:COPIES”, but this time “Soft delete per UP#COPIES”, allowing for the possibility of the user returning and wanting access to their edit history, such as some things not fully transferred to mainspace. SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:11, 1 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Male infertility crisis, which also preserves the history. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:55, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Would blanking not be preferable to redirecting? No-one is likely to navigate to the sandbox while actually wanting the live article. Whereas a sandbox not currently in use being blank seems fairly reasonable. User:GKFXtalk 21:39, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.