Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ruthsayer

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:58, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

User:Ruthsayer


This isn't really a userpage but a engine for someone to rant about something. Island Monkey talk the talk 16:25, 22 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Above the list of nominations here, there's a series of statements about what should be done before nominating someone's userpage for deletion. Let me quote:


 * Consider explaining your concerns on the user's talk page with a personal note or by adding ~ to their talk page. This step assumes good faith and civility; often the user is simply unaware of the guidelines, and the page can either be fixed or speedily deleted using . 
 * Take care not to bite newcomers - sometimes using the or  template and a pointer to WP:UP would be best first.


 * Now, tell me, when you tried and failed to delete this user page one minute after this user joined Wikipedia through the Account Creation Improvement Project, and when you nominated this page here two minutes after the speedy deletion was declined, with how many of the above steps had you complied? BencherliteTalk 23:27, 22 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Incidentally, any new user who can use the phrase "piling Pelion on top of Ossa" deserves a round of applause, not a thunderbolt... BencherliteTalk 23:31, 22 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - There is no basis for deletion or this nomination. -- &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  17:29, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep nomination does not give a rationale for the page to be deleted. There isn't any expectation that "a user page must look like this", so "not really a user page" is irrelevant. The subject of the attack is unclear, but I suspect it is the Wikipedia community (in which case it is perfectly acceptable content). And again you need to stop nominating user pages for deletion minutes after they are created. Hut 8.5 18:08, 26 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.