Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rwghana/Thirteen Threads - Oxlajuj B'atz' (Non-Profit)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:00, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

User:Rwghana/Thirteen Threads - Oxlajuj B'atz' (Non-Profit)


Non-profit that fails WP:CORP and stale draft with no hope of becoming an article. They are mentioned here Legacypac (talk) 10:06, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Stale draft, not viable in articlespace, no reasonable chance of surviving AfD. Possibly a copyvio as well given it consists purely of a mission statement and a list of programs; what bits aren't copied-and-pasted are likely close enough paraphrasings to violate copyright. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 12:13, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Viable draft, notable topic. No policy-compliant reason given for deletion, and page is not in any way problematic. As it says at the top of WP:MFD, 'we do not delete user subpages merely to "clean up" userspace.' Thparkth (talk) 18:49, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If it's a viable draft, you should move it to articlespace. There's also the problem of closely paraphrased and copied text, which renders it a borderline G12 candidate. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 20:40, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * "Viable draft" and "ready to move to articlespace" are not synonyms. Thparkth (talk) 22:25, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:SOFIXIT. Wikipedia is not the place for bad ideas, like keeping fair use content outside of articlespace with no reasonable chance of it ever being integrated into an article. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 22:47, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If you sincerely want someone to FIXIT, that will be difficult after the page is deleted. A2soup (talk) 18:14, 25 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as promotional with copied text (see the copyvios report, which shows identical text on other pages with an earlier date). Copyright violations certainly are problematic. ~ RobTalk 12:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.