Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ryanbstevens/Userboxes/This user is from the state of Kentucky




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep. RL0919 (talk) 00:24, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

User:Ryanbstevens/Userboxes/This user is from the state of Kentucky
Duplicate of existing userbox. Used by only one user. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - no reason for deletion presented. –xenotalk 19:03, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * "Duplicate of existing userbox" isn't a reason? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * It's stylistically different. Deletion does not save space. –xenotalk 19:09, 19 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Does no harm. The way to save space on the server is to not have these unnecessary discussions. The way to improve  Wikipedia is to work on dealing with actually harmful things--for example, trying to source the unsourced BLPs.  `    DGG ( talk ) 15:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Many userboxes fall into that category - deletion discussions take an order of magnitude more space than leaving them be. Collect (talk) 13:11, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep No adequate reason for deletion has been presented. Warrah (talk) 12:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.