Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ryanbstevens/userboxes/Not perfect




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep. RL0919 (talk) 00:19, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

User:Ryanbstevens/userboxes/Not perfect
Duplicate of Template:User screw and User:Saoshyant/Userboxes/User oops. (Note: I had remembered that this user created a flood of poor userboxen but never got around to MFDing them until now.) Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:56, 19 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - no pressing need to delete, no space will be gained. –xenotalk 18:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - no better or worse than the hundreds of other userboxes floating around. Canterbury Tail   talk  18:59, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Why bother removing innocuous material like this? Every time we do it, at least one user will be annoyed, and that's more important. The way to avoid wasting  space on the server is to not  have these unnecessary discussions.    DGG ( talk ) 15:37, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Userbox is harmless. Discussion about whether to delete it consumes more space than the userbox itself. --SJK (talk) 09:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Well, nobody is perfect. No good reason for deletion is presented. Warrah (talk) 12:46, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.