Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ryanbstevens/userboxes/Republican party




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep. Potentially divisive content has been edited out, and redundancy has little weight as a reason for deletion of user-space content. RL0919 (talk) 00:11, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

User:Ryanbstevens/userboxes/Republican party
Divisive userbox. "But despises x" is frowned on in userboxen, and there are already existing userboxen that just say "This user is a republican/democrat/whatever party." Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Couldn't you have just been bold and edited out the offending line? The userbox is used by a single user, who has been inactive for over half a year. –xenotalk
 * This has been done, suggest speedy closure. –xenotalk 18:54, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Still a duplicate, which I think is still a reason to delete. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:08, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you show me where in the deletion policy it says that? –xenotalk 19:10, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Why bother removing innocuous material like this? Every time we do it, at least one user will be annoyed, and that's more important. The way to avoid wasting  space on the server is to not  have these unnecessary discussions.    DGG ( talk ) 15:36, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, redundant (or redundent? I can't spell right now) to User:The Gerg/Userboxes/User Republican, which is used by many editors and has a far longer history without the divisive history.  Nyttend (talk) 23:27, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep with Xeno's change.  fetch  comms  ☛ 23:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Userbox is harmless. Discussion about whether to delete it consumes more space than the userbox itself. --SJK (talk) 09:55, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.