Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ryanhannold


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Speedied as nonsense. The broad latitude generally allowed in userspace is substantially less relevant where the user has made no other edits after three years. Newyorkbrad (talk) 18:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

User:Ryanhannold
Obvious vandalism from 2006. No user activity since the page was created. Inexplicably declined for speedy deletion. --MZMcBride (talk) 08:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh honestly, use some common sense with CSD. Speedy delete per WP:IAR, WP:BURO and WP:COMMONSENSE. 70.171.247.44 (talk) 08:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Not speediable, being in CAT:TEMP is not good enough, there is no current CSD criteria. I could support a CSD criteria for such pages (Old, no good faith contributions to wikipedia) if no one claims a use for them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SmokeyJoe (talk • contribs)
 * Delete as vandalism --Drogonov (talk) 11:52, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.