Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ryansworld100000

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep - rewritten page is acceptable. JohnCD (talk) 21:36, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

User:Ryansworld100000


WP:BIO states that userspace should not contain "Inappropriate or excessive personal information unrelated to Wikipedia" The page also includes inappropriate information about family members. Dougweller (talk) 19:24, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I have to do an user article re-write. I have to strongly oppose the deletion and request someone to re-review the userpage. Ryan (talk) 04:50, 22 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as promotion, clearly intended to direct readers to offsite interests . The user is welcome to create a new userpage that introduces himself as a Wikipedian. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:37, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * There does seem to be some confusion. Mine at least.  I suggest this edit makes it a better userpage.  I think that the directory of offsite stuff is pushing things, but not enough to get worked up about, if he is really a contributor.  I think, with the off-site stuff in a collapsed box, it is less likely to be considered a WEBHOST violation.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I see that User:Ryansworld100000 had already done a major rewrite (04:40, 22 March 2014) that would seem to have dealt with the major issues of the nominator. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Acceptable as a user page right now. I'm not concerned by the list of usernames on other sites. None contain URLs, so they're not very effective if theyr'e "clearly intended to direct readers" there. Quite the contrary, it can be useful to have alternate means for contacting a user off Wikipedia. SmokeyJoe, did you know that Infobox user actually has 20 parameters for such information? This should never have been an AfC submission, of course, but it's fine as a user page. --BDD (talk) 17:44, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The number of non wikipedia related usernames is a concern. You are not allowed to use a Wikipedia userpage as a directory for your online activities. If the list were severely cut, it would be ok. One or two offsite personal pages is absolutely fine, a directory, no.
 * Yes, the paragraph of prose is good as a userpage. Is it really the user? Why was it submitted for mainspace?  I see the user is not an SPA, which I may have thought when I first commented. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:03, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Hm. I initially assumed the AfC submission was attributable to the confusion of a new user. I see now that the user isn't new, although he's still inexperienced enough that this could have been a mistake. Perhaps he saw his page tagged for deletion and thought that he could submit it for approval elsewhere; I don't think he was actually trying to write a vanity (mainspace) article. --BDD (talk) 21:11, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, is the latest revision ok? The latest edit removes some URLs that links to the profiles on virtual world and gaming websites. Ryan (talk) 08:53, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * It's more than ok by me. Are any of your photographs available for uploading? Wikipedian's photographs are most appreciated. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:27, 4 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Dougweller, are we good here? --BDD (talk) 16:55, 4 April 2014 (UTC)


 * BDD, looks good, thanks. 86.1.162.143 (talk) 17:27, 4 April 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.