Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ryder Busby/Sandbox5 (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep since the nominator withdrew (non-admin closure). Note: This is my first non-admin closure, so I may have made a mistake. YE  Pacific   Hurricane  19:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Ryder Busby/Sandbox5


Wikipedia is not a playground and none of these systems appear to be real. WP:NOT stays that"You may not host your own website, blog, wiki, or cloud at Wikipedia. Wikipedia pages are not: Personal web pages. Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. Limited biographical information is allowed, but user pages should not function as personal webpages or be repositories for large amounts of material that's irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog or to post your résumé, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account. The focus of user pages should not be social networking, or amusement, but rather providing a foundation for effective collaboration." I'm sorry, but feel it does not meet the guidelines, and thus I am shipping it to MFD. YE  Pacific   Hurricane  00:27, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Without wishing to comment on the userpage itself, wouldnt a nice note on the talkpage be a lot better than MFDing this thing 5 minutes after it was created.Jason Rees (talk) 13:33, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, this user has had the same issue with fake seasons before. YE  Pacific   Hurricane  16:18, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep and slap the nominator with a trout. Sandbox of active user with a clean block log, proposed five minutes after userpage creation. Editors should find something better to do than patrol userspace. I wonder if these two editors have history? --Surturz (talk) 07:49, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Telling others to stop patrolling userpasce is a good way to waste your time. For the record, This is what the page looked like when I MFD'd this. The only reason why I saw this is that because I MF'd this last year. I don't understand what time has to do with this; an article can still be edited during the five day period. In this case, I realized it right after I Md'd this thing. YE  Pacific   Hurricane  13:27, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - even before the blank, there was nothing objectionable here. Achowat (talk) 13:45, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Except those storms never really existed AFAIK. Either way, all issues have been addressed so I am closing this nom. YE   Pacific   Hurricane  19:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC)