Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ryrod99/The Annexation of Santo Domingo

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:34, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Ryrod99/The Annexation of Santo Domingo


User developed this here then placed it all in mainspace under the same title. Attribution is therefore not an issue, this is just a stale draft copy of the first version of the mainspace article and should be deleted as redundent. Legacypac (talk) 04:28, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete' as unlikely needed. SwisterTwister   talk  19:42, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Annexation of Santo Domingo. No reason to delete.  A desire by, by the author or anyone else, to review the early versions is reason to keep.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:16, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Blank with Inactive userpage blanked. There could be any number or worthwhile purposes related to this.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:18, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Why are you voting twice within two minutes and differently for that matter? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 17:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * It looks like a browser tab error. The 2nd !vote looks intended for the next nomination in line, Monica Rose. Sorry. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No attribution needed. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 17:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom, redundant. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.