Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:S-J-S-F-M-W/Transition of Interwiki Policies or Guidelines




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  speedy delete (non-admin closure) -- The Earwig  (Talk &#124; Contribs) 10:54, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

User:S-J-S-F-M-W/Transition of Interwiki Policies or Guidelines
Rambling incoherence, seems to be divisive, no idea what this is going for. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:01, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment It might be advisable to give the editor a chance to finish it.    DGG ( talk ) 19:08, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Incoherent and useless gibberish, but it's in his userspace and it's not violating policy. (While it's incoherent, at least it's about Wikipedia, albeit probably not something that's ever going to be used or paid attention to.) r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 19:24, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Changing to delete. User is probably about to be indefblocked anyway (see WP:ANI), so no point keeping this. r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 02:29, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. If this was in the Wikipedia: space I would !vote delete, but it's not. Let the user work on this; maybe some time in the future we'll actually be able to get something out of it. If not, then well, it's only a user subpage. The Earwig  (Talk &#124; Contribs) 19:43, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. User indefinitely blocked; no use having this now. The Earwig  (Talk &#124; Contribs) 02:56, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep As The Earwig says, if this was in main space, I'd be saying Delete too - but this was only created a few hours ago, there is nothing in it that appears to be against policy, and the user may yet add some decent content to it. --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 20:07, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete With an indef block, it's not worth keeping this now --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 07:10, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have nothing against users drafting such pages in userspace; however, the user in question has since been indefinitely blocked, so the draft in question is useless. — Gavia immer (talk) 02:52, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.