Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SBirdTVS/TransVault

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:35, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

User:SBirdTVS/TransVault


No independant sources show notability. Seems like a run of the mill company trying to promote itself on wikipedia. Legacypac (talk) 05:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Good faith article drafting that will not pass WP:CORP. We need better guidelines for this stuff.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:56, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Unless there is a presumption that the material should not be allowed to be refunded, blanking is preferable, adding administrative overheads is not good. The user has just been welcomed for the first time.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:31, 10 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Draft from October 2013 that does not seem to pass WP:CORP. If the editor returns or someone else thinks there's a chance, they can request restoration but it's basically a skeleton to work off and not much more. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:27, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and Ricky81682. No need to keep old stuff that will never become a viable article. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.