Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SI461AN


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as copyright violation  Chillum  00:25, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

User:SI461AN
Inappropriate use of user space. Bringing here as speedy deletion was declined. I claimed it was patent nonsense. The declining admin said non-English text is exempt from CSD G1. I'd be curious to know which language this is, though: Tampilan Data Trace h g f e d c b a Angka h h h l l l l l l 0 h h h h h h l l h 1 h h l h l l h l l 2 h h l h h l l l l 3 h h l l h h l l h 4 h h l l h l l h l 5 h h l l l l l h h 6 h h h h h h l l l 7 h h l l l l l l l 8 h h l l h h l l l 9 --MZMcBride (talk) 07:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Blank. Looks like a non-English CV, with some non-readable data included.  Not patent nonsense.  Not speediable.  User edited only on 3 July 2009, was welcomed, and has done nothing since.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep for now. Harmless. Blank after 3 July 2008 and leave a nice explanatory note on the talk page. When in doubt we should try to keep. Also, the language is either Malay or Indonesian (two essentially identical languages). I only know this because of doing a lot of cross-wiki spam cleanup; don't ask me what that stuff means (other than the obvious like "POLITEKNIK"). I don't see any contributions on either id. or my.wikipedia for a user with this name. Short CVs are OK if the person is contributing -- that's what many user pages of active members are; they're just not formatted as such. If I thought this was commercial in nature, then I'd say delete on site as G11. -- A. B. (talk • contribs) 12:51, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep/Blank No sign of being commercial at all, likely a long essay or c.v.  Collect (talk) 13:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as copyright violation. Much (all?) of the text on the page is copied from various blogs and information websites.  I selected various portions of the text and searched Google, and each search turned up cut-and-paste copying. Peacock (talk) 15:44, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Seems to be a rather blatant violation of WP:UP and WP:NOT as well as a possible copyvio. This isn't a "short" CV and the user isn't contributing, so I don't quite understand the argument to keep given above. Mr.Z-man 21:05, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.