Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SII Adam S017/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  soft delete. While User:Newyorkbrad's suggestion is admirable, the editor contested the mainspace deletion at Talk:SII Adam S017 by arguing that this is some non-canon unsourced trivia "established ... on two other websites [which allegedly did] not [have] a problem with this topic" so the editor can respond and provide more context if they wish to request restoration. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

User:SII Adam S017/sandbox


Appears to be made up. Posted as an article which has been deleted A11. Adam9007 (talk) 00:22, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:11, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy, U5 for (talk)  11:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Clearly this does not belong on Wikipedia, but a word with the editor might be more newbie-friendly than an MfD template. Newyorkbrad (talk) 22:58, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.