Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SMcCandlish/It (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:10, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

User:SMcCandlish/It

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

[withdrawn] Dronebogus (talk) 21:57, 28 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Oppose any nomination that starts by attacking editors who voted in a certain way in a past discussion (=Keep essay.). What a great way to set the tone for what will undoubtedly be a civil discussion and not a waste of everyone's time. 15 (talk) 09:57, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: “Humorous” is actually a poor word for these sorts of things. What it really is is provocative reflective explorations on sensitive complicated topics.  The merit is not in being funny, but in provoking thought.  This provokes some thought, and is not simple abuse.  It is well within user leeway.  I agree that the nom is excessively aggressive.  SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:34, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Question. Are we really doing this again? Could you just withdraw this? This nomination isn't going to accomplish anything. For the record, I argued for deletion last MfD. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 17:15, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.