Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SPUI/jajaja


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 15:44, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

User:SPUI/jajaja
Causes Firefox to freeze and contains swearwords Qu e ntin Smith 11:36, 22 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete --Qu e ntin Smith 11:36, 22 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, wildly unnecessary. If it's meant to be a joke, then it's missed the mark. haz  (us e r talk) 12:06, 22 June 2006
 * Delete per nom and authors above. --Arnzy (whats up?)  12:56, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, there's clearly nothing about this user-subpage that's meant to help in building WP. Vulgarity and browser incompatibility aren't reasons to delete a userpage, but lack of encyclopedic purpose is.  Barno 14:14, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.-- A c1983fan  ( talk  •  contribs ) 19:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Didn't crash my browser. Mackensen (talk) 22:42, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It does indeed seriously mess with Firefox, and disrupting the web browsers of a large proportion of editors and readers is, well, disruptive, and enough reason on its own to delete.  --Hugh Charles Parker (talk - contribs) 22:52, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Doesn't crash my Firefox either (v 1.5.0.4), but is annyoning. — xaosflux  Talk  03:39, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It really didn't mess around that much with my firefox, but I'm a newbie. It still is annoying and way too much. Yanksox (talk) 05:14, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Go Opera! Er, Delete per nom and all other deletes. Hbdragon88 05:16, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above! Computerjoe 's talk 13:15, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Blank, keep history browser crashing pages are annoying :( Ashibaka tock 00:56, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment didnt crash my browser, wikipedia is not censored, so swear words don't matter, its more of a WP:Beans issue for me, as it covers the toolbar, making reverting vandalism like this tedious and long. Philc  TECI 01:01, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Why WP:BEANS? No-one told someone to do anything.
 * The page itself is enough encouragement for any vandal. Philc  TECI 12:18, 25 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete — Natha  n  ( talk ) 03:35, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per no point. What possessed anyone to create this page? Al e thiophileEvil Kitten wants you to TALK TO ME 00:23, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: potential vandalism tool, can be used to freeze up browsers.-- May the Force be with you! Shr e shth91(review me!) 08:38, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment doesn't crash my browser (IE 7, Beta 1; FTW) but funny as hell. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 08:46, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * No problems in K-meleon. If it crashes Firefox, maybe you should use a non-broken browser. If people start vandalizing like this, simply hit alt-H. Not hard at all. Oh, and that means keep, but this isn't a vote, so I assume this will be closed as keep. --SPUI (T - C) 08:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Using improper HTML syntax and blaming any resulting errors on the browser is rather poor form, don't you think? Powers 13:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Crashing problems in Firefox may be due to how the exaggerated text sizes are rendered. In IE, the text gets to about 36pt at the sixth "jajaja" and remains there for the remaining 49 iterations, but in Firefox, it appears to just keep getting bigger and bigger (I would estimate at least 5000pt).  My version of Firefox displayed it OK, but the huge font sizes mean that most of the page is just blue text (specifically, several gigantic "j"s).  Powers 13:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.