Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sabesh1/Enhanced efficiency fertilizers

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Speedy Deleted (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  06:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Sabesh1/Enhanced efficiency fertilizers


Essay advocating various things in userspace. Zero sources for any of the claims and data and so heavily laced with personal opinion it would require a complete rewrite to be useful. The only thing ever posted by this account. Clear case of WP:NOTAWEBHOST and WP:NOTSOAPBOX. WP:U5 declined by User:Cryptic without reason. Legacypac (talk) 04:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * It was declined because it was explicitly marked as a draft, which makes it not be a U5, until you edited that off. We have a word for people who people who edit a page that was not a speedy candidate to make it into one.  That word is "vandal".  If you don't want to be blocked like one, don't act like one.The page may well be deletable for other reasons; I haven't had a chance to assess it yet. —Cryptic 04:22, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Like, say, being a copyvio. That's the sort of thing you should check first before trying to shoehorn it into a speedy deletion criterion which it very obviously doesn't qualify for. —Cryptic 04:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.