Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SageRad

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. North America1000 12:32, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

User:SageRad


This is the sort of polemical use of user space to attack multiple Wikipedia editors that is not permitted in user pages. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:15, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Meh/keep By itself this isn't really something that would qualify for deletion.  I see that there's an ongoing dispute that this is part of, but even considering that, I still don't really think this falls under something we'd delete.  As a comparison, if he said the same thing in an unrelated conversation, I don't think outright removal of his comment would be justified, so I don't think we should delete this either.  Gigs (talk) 04:26, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - I feel the same way as Gigs. While it's hardly conducive to cooperation between editors it doesn't name any particular editor and while I disagree with their opinion, I don't see any need to suppress it. SmartSE (talk) 16:08, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Neutral. The comments violates our various talk page guidelines in that it's assuming other editors are out there to support industry, etc. simply because those editors don't agree with SageRad's edits. It's lashing out that they have been warned about quite a few times. That being said, it's probably best to let them just delete the content themselves or just leave it as evidence for for ANI if it comes to that. They've been given multiple opportunities to correct their behavior, so I'd say just make this another opportunity for them to right themselves or else just let it pile up for an eventual blowback if they keep going down this route. Kingofaces43 (talk) 15:01, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note The problematic content has been removed. SmartSE (talk) 16:14, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Content has completely been changed since nomination. Now it is a valid user page. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 8 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.