Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sambahips/Latin and Ballroom Dance Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Delete, without prejudice for undeletion if the user returns and has a bona finde interest in improving this to be represented as an article. — xaosflux  Talk  05:55, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

User:Sambahips/Latin and Ballroom Dance Association
Created April 2008 as an article. USERFIED after nearly dying in this AFD. Author hasn't been seen since shortly after AFD closed. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  22:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: When an article is userfied for improvement, there needs to be effort made to improve. It isn't for dead article storage.&mdash;Kww(talk) 14:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per KWW. Userfication of aticles is okay only when the userfied article later gets worked on. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 20:47, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Userfication for some odd reason makes no statement as to proper length of time. Some get deleted at 2 months, some get kept at 3 years. Unless a guideline is really set, I see no reason to delete this. Collect (talk) 12:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, unless anyone is willing to take this up and turn it into an encyclopaedic article (which I doubt is possible here). Terraxos (talk) 20:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.