Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Samiwikia

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy delete per U5 by Jimfbleak. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 00:56, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

User:Samiwikia


User pages violation, namely Excessive unrelated content': "Writings, information, discussions, and activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals" and "Very divisive or offensive material not related to encyclopedia editing". The vast majority of the user's contributions in the last month has been stuff like "SHUSH I HATE NORTH KOREA" on his user page. The page was already speedily deleted before, which means the user is a repeat offender. Probably deserves a strong warning or a block.—J. M. (talk) 20:49, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Block this user for being stupid and then delete the junk on their user page. And if this doesn't work and the junk is restored then ban this user forever.Catfurball (talk) 21:03, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment The user page writings appear to be a version of Polandball without graphics. Kges1901 (talk) 21:06, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as polemic and inflammatory. Mostly concur with User:Catfurball.  Paging User:Jimfbleak, who previously deleted the user page:  Is a block necessary?  Robert McClenon (talk) 22:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment. I've speedied the page which apart from anything else is a violation of Not web host. It looks as if the user hasn't actually been warned previously, so I've blocked for two weeks, will indef if their is a third attempt Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:03, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Improperly deleted  has improperly deleted this page citing "(U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host)".  WP:CSD cannot be used because  has too many reasonable mainspace edits.  This was an important consideration in the proposal of CSD#U5.  Jimbleak, please do not compromise CSD policy by ignoring specific objective criteria, namely that U5 is only for subpages of non-contributors.  Please undelete so that it can be properly deleted (or not) per this MfD.  I have not seen the page.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:44, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment The user's mainspace edits may look constructive at first sight, but on closer inspection, the majority of them are not much more reasonable than the editor's user page edits, and routinely get reverted. Besides, the editor was indeed mainly focused on adding nonsense to their user page, that was their main activity on Wikipedia.—J. M. (talk) 05:15, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * OK yes, I take that back. I went through his mainspace edits.  They are vandalism.   was never a genuine contributor.  U5 was correct.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:03, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.