Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Samrajaugustin

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  03:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Samrajaugustin

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Copy of WP:PAGEHIST. Flounder fillet (talk) 03:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is a stupid copy with all of the formatting, which is less stupid than the usual stupid copy, but still stupid. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:52, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment wouldn't that just make it a copy? ꧁ Zanahary ꧂ 11:02, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment - Even if the appearance of the copy isn't stupid, the existence of the copy is stupid. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:19, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have written an essay, WP:Stupid copies, because these keep being found and nominated for deletion. Other editors are welcome to cite the essay, which summarizes the policy reasons why the stupid copies are stupid, and to expand the essay if that is thought appropriate.  Robert McClenon (talk) 17:52, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * It is not a good essay. It diminishes Wikipedia. SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.