Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Samrat651

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy delete per WP:G3 and WP:G10 Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:11, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

User:Samrat651

 * – (View MfD)

Not sure what this is, but if Google Translate is correct then this is obviously an inappropriate user page. Adam9007 (talk) 01:45, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
 * As with many of your other nominations, just blank it and move on rather than create work for other people. I mean, yeah, it's hard to argue with deletion, but going through MfD is a net negative effect, since there's no functional difference between blanking it and deleting it beyond creating an MfD. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 21:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Neutral because I haven't translated it and probably don't want to translate it. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:37, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Don't really care: don't really care. A more clearly problematic page should probably go via G3/U5 but blank or delete are both acceptable for this one. I personally wouldn't bother, but since it's already here... Alpha3031 (t • c) 05:54, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a G3 and G10. As a native speaker of Hindi, I can confidently say that the text here translates as follows: "Babu Rao came to kill me with an assault rifle but his head blew up. Lol." This is not only obvious vandalism, but also an attack page.  Java Hurricane  09:55, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.