Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Samwb123/Hidden

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. NAC. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 23:39, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Samwb123/Hidden
secret page games Triona (talk) 00:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Does not violate any policies, not a secret page.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  01:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The RFC on keeping secret pages has not started yet while the MfD was clearly in favour of keeping them. These nominations must stop until the RFC on secret pages reaches consensus. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 01:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * This isn't even a secret page, so it doesn't matter what the outcome of the RfC is.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  01:31, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Even better. I agree. This just makes keeping it even easier. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 01:38, 14 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep per above discussion. These nominations are much more disruptive to Wikipedia life than the pages they are getting themselves worked up about. __meco (talk) 07:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Doesn't cause any harm, follows wikipedia guidelines, what's the point in deleting? PlantRunner (talk) 23:43, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a test page, not a secret page, and does not violate any policies or guidelines. Cunard (talk) 02:06, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.