Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sandeep jat

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:31, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

User:Sandeep jat


Wikipedia is not a resume service. MER-C 12:55, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Refer author to Alternative outlets.  Virtually never viewed until listing here, next time please just blank.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:16, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Next time do not blank, deletion sends the message better to freeloaders. jni (delete)...just not interested 09:52, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Sandeep will never be back. The page is never viewed. The message is never received. We are just talking to ourselves, doing busywork in backroom where nearly no one looks in. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:27, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes indeed he will never be back. Therefore no need to refer him to Alternative outlets, contrary to your earlier comment, nor post MfD notification to his talk page. Should be U5 but process theorists managed to botch that criteria in support of this useless busywork. Just two clicks, one to Delete button and second to confirm the delete action should be the response for this kind of blatant resume-spam. jni (delete)...just not interested 15:28, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I'd prefer the Alternative outlets to be auto-posted on the Usertalk page. If this were done, I might support expansion of U5. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:32, 12 April 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.