Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sarahkme/الأنثربولوجيا الطبية الشرعية

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 03:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Sarahkme/الأنثربولوجيا الطبية الشرعية


Stale draft in Arabic Legacypac (talk) 07:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Lede translated: Legitimate medical anthropology is the application of knowledge of bio - anthropology and science of human bones in a legal circumference, and in most cases it is applied in criminal cases when the remains of (body) of the victim in the advanced stages of decomposition. It can help anthropologists and medical scientists legitimacy in the identification of the deceased persons who decomposition of their remains or burned or disfigured or has become possible not to identify them for another reason. According to the adjective "legitimate" to the application of this sub-field of science in the courts.
 * Maybe... Initial impression is WP:OR.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Further investigation firms impression of WP:NEOLOGISM and WP:NOR. The phrase is unsourced, doesn't appear in a google ngram search, and ghits do not reveal the topic elsewhere mentioned.  Nothing already at Medical anthropology.  Note placed at Talk:Medical_anthropology.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Probably would violate WP:A2 in mainspace as a duplicate of ar:أنثربولوجيا طبية شرعية (which itself has an IW to forensic anthropology, suggesting it'd also fail WP:A10). In fact it looks like the initial version of the Arabic Wikipedia article was created by the same account, and contained the same content. I get the feeling the editor created it here on accident, intending to create it at Arabic Wikipedia instead, and just never cleaned it up. As such, non-viable article. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 07:57, 22 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.