Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sardanaphalus/Template:Infobox Philosopher

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Spartaz Humbug! 17:39, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

User:Sardanaphalus/Template:Infobox Philosopher
Dead sandbox proposal from an editor who hasn't made any contributions in nearly two years. No salvageable material. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:22, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - it's totally harmless. Just a failed proposal.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 13:12, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't see any reason to delete...  Hi 8 7 8   (Come yell at me!) 16:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep This is userspace, after all. No slid reason for deletion. Collect (talk) 20:31, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Userspace is not supposed to be for permanent copies of material intended for the encyclopedia but then rejected. This is quite evidently never going to be used again for any purpose on the project. I'd have asked the user if he was up for self-nominating but he's long gone. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 21:45, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes they are. That's why they invented the historical reference template. Anything proposal, no matter how rubbish, have a right to stay here. This is a wiki. Old things never disappear.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 11:15, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: WP:PAPER   Snotty Wong   yak 22:35, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep-No reason to delete, so maintain status quo.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 01:37, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as per WP:PAPER policy, though the WP:NOTIMELIMIT guideline is more on-target. Mostly, though, I'm unclear what criteria it meets to merit deletion. This page, while I agree it's unlikely to be used, is inoffensive and the work of a good-faith editor who may choose to resume the work at some point. Matt Deres (talk) 04:07, 1 July 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.