Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Savvymcc/Gabbie Hanna

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  history merge. signed,Rosguill talk 21:58, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

User:Savvymcc/Gabbie Hanna

 * – (View MfD)

This page was created in mainspace in December 2016 and became the topic of an AfD in April 2017 (Articles for deletion/Gabbie Hanna, where the result was to userfy it (moved to student creator's userspace User:Savvymcc/Gabbie Hanna). It appears that the student creator didn't make any attempt to improve the article after first creating it. A separate creator's mainspace article Gabbie Hanna survived it's own AfD at Articles for deletion/Gabbie Hanna (2nd nomination), and has existed since September 2017. I think it's safe to delete User:Savvymcc/Gabbie Hanna. — Scottyoak2 (talk) 09:18, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Hold on a minute I'm showing this draft was created first, so needs to be updated as the page creator of Gabbie Hanna (this draft predates Gabbie Hanna). I'm pinging  here for his expertise, but I think we need to merge the history here per WP:ATT. --Doug Mehus  T · C  23:57, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * History merge with or redirect to the mainspace article. Be very sure about possible attribution failure when deleting.  There is no good reason for deletion. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - I agree with User:Dmehus and User:SmokeyJoe that there may be a need for history merge. In any case, I disagree with User:Scottyoak2 that it is safe to delete the subject page.  This isn't crud, and it does no harm to keep this as a redirect with or without merge, and might do good.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:42, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * History merge, pretty obviously. I'm not sure any other result would actually be policy compliant, and I would NAC with that result, except I can't actually perform the merge, not being an admin. (So much for WP:NOT, ha ha.)  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  07:07, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * All the more reason why I think an unbundling of the "delete" function would be useful for experienced editors like you or SmokeyJoe. We've unbundled the CheckUser and Oversight functions, which require signing of confidentiality agreements, so it's odd to me the community has never embraced unbundling the "delete" function. Doug Mehus T · C  13:55, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.