Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Schalkie




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:WEBHOST. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:30, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Schalkie
A very long journal of a South African immigrant from 1839. No apparent connection to or use for Wikipedia. User has no edits outside this page. Psychonaut (talk) 13:38, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Tells us about the editor. Material, as a translation, is actually encyclopedic more than most such userpages. Most editors do not do a lot of edits in 2 weeks.  Never welcomed (seems to be too many such cases where the first words are "your stuff will get deleted" . Collect (talk) 13:55, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The editor only has one edit - that edit is to this page. It is clear that the editor is using Wikipedia as their personal web host. This sort of thing may be acceptable if the user edited frequently (so they could use it for reference, etc.) but because the user's only edit has been to this page, I say delete. This is what I think happened: the user, Schalkie (who admits that they are a relative of the subject of the journal translated to this user page) needed somewhere to put their content online so they could show friends, etc., so they chose Wikipedia. JulieSpaulding 12:58, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.