Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Schiller Indie

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:34, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Schiller Indie


WP:FAKEARTICLE. We already have an article on independent music. Whpq (talk) 10:04, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, the amount of self-promotion compared to the total is minimal, so IMO, it doesn't violate WP:UPNOT, although I would encourage the user to contribute to the main article instead. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:43, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - The reason for the nomination was was not that it was promotional, but rather it looks like an article. If you are seeing it as a user draft, then I've no objection to moving it to a sandbox although I don't see that as particularly useful.  As you've pointed out, the editor could be contributing directly to the independent music article. -- Whpq (talk) 03:16, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * As far as I know, there is no rule against having this on a user page. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * As stated in the nomination, I feel the page contravenes WP:FAKEARTICLE. -- Whpq (talk) 15:20, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. After another careful review of WP:FAKEARTICLE and the user page, I now agree with Whpq that this page is against the clause that "Userspace ... should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles". -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.