Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sclarkson/Sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 01:52, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

User:Sclarkson/Sandbox
Relisted. 00:30, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Delete abandoned autobiography. Probably falls just short of WP:GNG anyways. Pichpich (talk) 18:46, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Not Sure-- The article looks like it could be moved to mainspace if the subject meets WP:JUDGE. (Sadly, my legal knowledge is such that I don't know if he does.) --  E♴  (talk)  20:05, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep has not been abandoned for too long, and could make an article in the future. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:56, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 18:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * A Google News Archive search returns merely passing mentions. According to the article, the subject is a lawyer. There is no mention of the subject's being a judge, so the failed notability proposal WP:JUDGE would not apply. Created in September 2007 and last edited in July 2010, this draft has been abandoned for 9 months. Because the subject is non-notable, the page should be deleted as it will not survive in mainspace. Cunard (talk) 18:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio Let's talk about it! 00:30, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete While nine months of abandonment isn't terribly long, I'm nudged towards supporting deletion by the fact that this page has existed in userspace since 2007. That leads me to believe that this is a WP:FAKEARTICLE, intended to remain in userspace indefinitely. Moreover, I looked for sources to help establish the notability of the subject of this old draft, but to no avail. As best I can tell, Scott C. Clarkson fails WP:BIO; therefore, moving this to mainspace would be inappropriate. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 21:49, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per A Stop at Willoughby. -- Klein zach  02:59, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per Cunard. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.