Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Scott MacDonald

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 19:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Scott MacDonald


WP:Polemic  User pages are not to be used for this purpose per  WP:POLEMIC. I support Scott's right to express his view, but not against guidelines. He can create a poll on a seperate page, similar to  this one. @- Kosh ► Talk to the Vorlons ►  Moon Base Alpha  -@ 19:04, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep: This deletion nomination is inappropriate. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Oh please! It's a perfectly fine use of the userpage. Or I dare you to nominate Malleus' page which has the "There are many aspects of Wikipedia's governance that seem to me to be at best ill-considered and at worst corrupt, and little recognition that some things need to change....." "polemic" on it. Or better yet, all the user pages with the ass-kissing "Wikipedia is dah awesomest!" "polemics" out there. Just leave it the hell alone. Stop being a DICK. Volunteer Marek  19:10, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Strongly Oppose I suppose the irony of what can clearly be perceived as censoring Scott's comment is lost on the nominator, given the subject matter. Not to mention the accusations of hypocrisy and hubris that will fly about on the likes of Wikipedia Review.  Please will someone with common sense speedy close this.  Wee Curry Monster talk 19:11, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Exceedingly Speedy Keep And restore the material deleted by the MfD proposer post-haste. Collect (talk) 19:11, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep: the policy says "Polemical statements unrelated to Wikipedia". The page in question not only very relevant to WP but has gathered significant support in just a few days, and as a record of such it needs keeping.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 19:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * IAR speedy keep, doesn't fall under any of the POLEMIC categories.-- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:14, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep Legitimate viewpoint. Misreading of WP:POLEMIC. I have restored the material. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 19:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I had it on my clipboard to paste in when I got back to the current rev and saw you had beaten me to it. :-) -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:18, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.