Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sd31415/Signature Book


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy keep due to withdrawal of nomination. --Core desat  07:00, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Sd31415/Signature Book
This is basically a page that people sign, and if their signature is good enough, they receive a fair-use image. It essentially amounts to a guestbook, and Wikipedia is not a social networking site. It also doesn't help that the reward for winning is a fair-use image, which would violate WP:USER (unless that image were to go in an article instead, but the WP:NOT concern remains). Core desat  02:34, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * ''Struck out the part about the image, rest still applies. --Core desat  03:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn. --Core desat  07:00, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep - help builds community. Incidentally, users may be interested in this. Patstuarttalk 02:43, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Jimbo. The fair-use bit should be changed, though; if Sd31415 wants to award images (outside of article-space), they need to be free-content ones. Kirill Lokshin 02:46, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment: I always award free images (if not, let me know), and I don't award based on signature. I also award at the end of each month (not several times per month). Many Wikipedians keep signature books.  S .D.   ¿п?  § 02:55, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep - harmless, good-natured, and conducive to the spirit of cooperation ˉˉanetode╦╩ 03:00, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * keep - no threat to the project, no violation of intentions of any policies, good expression of wikilove. Since it is in the user namespace, why get all worked-up over it?  Jerry lavoie 03:01, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment: Sorry for making everyone think I intended fair use. My intent was free use, and that's why I bolded the phrase.  S .D.   ¿п?  § 03:05, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep I think is fairly harmless, and Jimbo has already said that it was perfectly fine. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 03:11, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep per my userspace standard of "Is it actively harming the encyclopedia?", noting that it's rather ironic Jimbo referenced Esperanza. -Amark moo! 04:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.