Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Seal Boxer/Box of seals

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Sadly. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:42, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

User:Seal Boxer/Box of seals


A strange situation. User long since inactive and I don't see this page going anywhere. I'd go U5 but the user did some good mainspace work and there was this discussion on this page. Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Anthony_Seldon/Box_of_seals Legacypac (talk) 16:50, 7 March 2018 (UTC)


 * delete Andy Dingley (talk) 18:43, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * But it is sort of funny? Blank?  Add the humour tag and then blank?  Five years inactive.  I suppose, humour is in the moment, in the telling, requires context and has to keep moving.  This is now old, although still kind of cute.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:23, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The funniest part for me "There are boxes. There are seals. At times, seals have been placed within boxes. An encyclopedia article is more than the conjunction of two random nouns and a concordance. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:39, 15 March 2013 (UTC)" but I think the joke is over now. Legacypac (talk) 22:26, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - It does have humour, but it can't hang around on that basis. I'm assuming the author's not the well-known former headmaster? KJP1 (talk) 19:10, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.