Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Setswana/Hindu Rashtra of Constitution

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 21:23, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

User:Setswana/Hindu Rashtra of Constitution

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

A very strange creation that, apparently, espouse extreme Hindu nationalism, including a proposal to rescind voting rights to Muslims and Christians living in India. Additionally, the creator's competence to edit has recently been called into question by some users. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 23:25, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - It is not entirely clear what this unreferenced page is, but it does not appear to be a draft of an article. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:52, 2 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete nonsense and hate speech. Dronebogus (talk) 22:27, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Weak keep: Apparently, it is a real thing with some coverage in RSes. Hindustan Times, Times of India, India Today, and more. I'm just utterly disappointed at this development, of which I was unaware until today, but I'm not at all surprised. &#8212;CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 11:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * It is irrelevant whether or not it's a real thing. The main issue here is that, on Wikipedia, we can't have material that includes a proposal to rescind voting rights to minorities in a country. It is utterly discriminatory, and certainly should be deleted as something extremely inflammatory and divisive. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 13:45, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * By that reasoning we should delete every factual content on the holocaust, Jim Crow laws, or apartheid. The problem arises when they are whitewashed or glorified, not when they are presented in a direct factual manner, which is the case here. &#8212;CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 15:20, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.