Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sgerbic/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep. withdrawing, for reason given below.  DGG ( talk ) 17:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Sgerbic/sandbox


Essentially advocacy. even in a sandbox, this is not acceptable.  DGG ( talk ) 06:33, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * DGG, can you explain better? A single link that look much the same as several similar on User:Sgerbic?  The user is a serious regular contributor.  The most unacceptable think about this page I suppose is that the history contains so many unrelated things, I'd ask her to sandbox different articles in different sandboxes.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:51, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The page doesn't make much sense to me, but we generally give benefit of the doubt for userspace pages, and this doesn't cross any lines for me.- gadfium 09:29, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * , I don't see the connection between this page and Sgerberic's user page. His user page is an explanation of his method of training editors. This page has been used to write highly propagandistic articles such as, , is a attempt to promulgate his POV. But the MfD is not appropriate at this time, and I'm withdrawing it, because there is not any actual content in the current version. I'm instead going to concentrate on the articles developed here that I think need improvement or deletion. I do have an opinion about the use  for the creation of articles of a generic unnamed sandbox or numbered sandboxes,  instead of ones that indicate the subject,--it greatly increases the difficulty in tracing article history. But it is permitted.   DGG ( talk ) 17:47, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.