Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sgwendolyn

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:09, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

User:Sgwendolyn


Appears to be written in a promotional manner, but not enough to meet speedy deletion under G11. The user only contributed to her userpage and a few images of herself. — ξ xplicit  00:40, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - clearly promotional. Achowat (talk) 19:21, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 03:17, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing but promotion except for some nonsense (or is it failed attempts at ASCII art?).  I support a combinational interpretation of speedy delete G11 & G1 to delete (the nonsense shouldn't prevent "obvious promotion" from applying), noting that this was a non-serious contributor, if a polite explanation is given on the userpage regardless of the low probability that the user will ever edit again.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:43, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment the ASCII art looks better in the edit screen. Still inappropriate for userspace, however. Achowat (talk) 13:52, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Is this promotion? I can't even tell, though it definitely ain't useful. Lots of nonsense, and... giant... image... things and some large blocks of... keywords? Blah.  — Isarra ༆ 19:53, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Maybe it is test-promotion? Speedy delete per all of G11, G1 and G6?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:49, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.