Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Shāntián Tàiláng/Userboxes/Atheism

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. But deleting the redirect CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Shāntián Tàiláng/Userboxes/Atheism

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

So I've noticed that in the discussion for Miscellany for deletion/X is harmful userboxes, User:BillCJ/UBX/atheism Is Harmful was deleted but User:UBX/Religion Is Harmful wasn't? If the consensus that both were to be deleted then why is one still up while the other isn't? SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 19:14, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Actually, both were deleted, but I re-created the latter as a redirect (to a new & improved template) so that there wouldn't be so many redlinks on users' pages. Just look at this list. You wouldn't want those users finding themselves suddenly removed from Category:Atheist Wikipedians (as I was), now, would you? Shāntián Tàiláng (talk) 19:21, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Still goes against the general consensus of the original discussion, those users can be redirected to the discussion archive if they wonder why, also why was the template even grouped with Category:Atheist Wikipedians, and if recreations are suddenly allowed then why can't there be a recreation and modification of User:BillCJ/UBX/atheism Is Harmful as it goes both ways according to the original discussion. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 19:29, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * OK, but I think you can just delete the redirect page, rather than the User:Shāntián Tàiláng/Userboxes/Atheism page. Shāntián Tàiláng (talk) 21:54, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Shantian recreated the second one which went against the consensus of the original MfD; but then later changed it from being anti-religion to having the user "[fear] that religion might have a scary effect on societies", one far milder and not covered by the original MfD. The redirect should probably be deleted but the userbox has been changed enough that it's no longer in my opinion subjected to the original MfD. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 00:02, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much. Shāntián Tàiláng (talk) 19:24, 13 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment if you're ok with deleting the redirect you can just place db-g7 on User:UBX/Religion Is Harmful as creator, and it will be deleted. No need to takeup more time discussing that. I think the change to User:Shāntián Tàiláng/Userboxes/Atheism is sufficient that it's not covered by the original mfd as  has already noted.  if you are also ok with the reworded version you can just close this as withdrawn to save a bit of time. Regards, 31.41.45.190 (talk) 21:23, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.