Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ShaunMacPherson/sandbox/




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 13:00, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

User:ShaunMacPherson/sandbox/
This is an abandoned sandbox that is from 2005. Miami33139 (talk) 08:02, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No reason to keep this around. ArcAngel (talk) 08:04, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Editor has been active as recently as a few months ago, and as the page is a sandbox with what appears to me useful information, there is no reason to believe it needed updating as a sandbox , nor that it is "abandoned". "No reason to keep" is invalid - absent an actual reason to delete, default to Keep. Collect (talk) 11:52, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Collect. An abandoned sandbox? Sure. But it's not masquerading as an article, and it isn't in violation of WP:SUB. There may be "no reason to keep this around," but there's no reason to delete it either. User:ShaunMacPherson hasn't edited in a few months, but his voice would obviously be helpful in this debate. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 15:23, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It is a partial fake article, it copies the October 2005 version of Comparison of instant messaging clients without attribution history. It is fine to keep a temporary workspace around with the intent to reincorporate. This is too old for it to be a viable workspace. The article has advanced too far. Keeping the table around without the attribution history is a GFDL violation. Miami33139 (talk) 18:28, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I see. In that case, delete to avoid GFDL problems. I just wish you'd mentioned that in your nomination, as that seems to be the better reason for deletion. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 16:58, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.