Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ShepOgden/Shepherd Ogden

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

User:ShepOgden/Shepherd Ogden

 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 00:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 12:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 12:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Autobio WP:FAKEARTICLE and far in excess of what an editor with such limited contributions should be posting about himself. WP:RESUME violation. Legacypac (talk) 17:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep but blank if concerned. The user edited, and the edit summaries are good.  Notice how users may return after seven years?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. If the editor returns, they can request a WP:REFUND. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * You are very light on valuing administrative overheads. OK, delete now that we are here, but it would have been more efficient to blank.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.