Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Side3ffect




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:33, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Side3ffect
User is apparently trying to set up his own separate wiki (for "networks, security, wireless security, application security, web security, and other computer stuffs [sic]") in userspace. Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST. Psychonaut (talk) 16:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - few edits from the user, only to their userpage and user talk page. Could've been handled by boldly blanking or redirecting to their talk page. Weak delete or redirect to user's talk page. –xenotalk 16:31, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:UP, in simple terms, states that any "substantial content" not related to Wikipedia may be deleted. Obviously, a 'rival' wiki set up on Wikipedia itself is in no way related to Wikipedia's functioning as an encyclopedia, so delete. JulieSpaulding 11:36, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as an abandoned user page of an inactive user that fails to meet the requirements of the user page guideline. It does not exist to "facilitate communication among" editors, contains "substantial content ... that is unrelated to Wikipedia", uses Wikipedia as a "general hosting service" to advertise another wiki project, and is not "used as part of [a user's] efforts to contribute" to Wikipedia. The user's only activity on Wikipedia consists of four edits, made 15 months ago over the span of twelve minutes, to his or her userspace; redirecting is unneeded as the user page has no incoming links except those generated by this MfD nomination. –Black Falcon (talk) 22:56, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * As per Xeno. If not speediable as promotion and/or test edits, then these old pages or inactive users without serious contributions are not worth our trouble, and should be blanked on discovery.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete An attempt to use Wikipedia as a free web host. Such attempts should always be deleted: otherwise it helps to convey the message that it's alright to do this. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:08, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.