Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sijokjose


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 17:11, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Sijokjose
User:Sijokjose and his sock 61.2.197.26 keep spamming articles and recreating pages about himself. User page content is spam only. Hús ö  nd  03:05, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is neither myspace or a free web host. MER-C 04:28, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Repeat vandal John Reaves 07:15, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, spam and recreation of deleted material. Badbilltucker 19:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep but watch closely. Obviously this user is a short step away from a block for spamming (and I am sure there is worse in deleted efforts I can't see as a non-admin), but as long as he's a user in good standing, he's entitled to a userpage of his choice within reason. MfD procedures can be used to delete userpages of users who seem to have disappeared but I don't think they are best suited for addressing the primary userpage of current users. Newyorkbrad 02:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I see your point but we don't know when/if he's coming back for more spam, and this user page shouldn't be around forever.-- Hús  ö  nd  03:35, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * And in turn I see your point, but I see you've put him on final warning for spamming, so either he shapes up or he won't be here all that much longer, and meanwhile he did contribute to an article today. By the way, is the user aware that his page is listed here or that you think he should change it? 03:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment The page's creator has been notified of this discussion. Badbilltucker 17:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete One (1) edit since July? This stretches the meaning of "current user" into utterly useless. --Calton | Talk 05:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Note Actually, the user made more edits (all to articles that were deleted as blatant spam).-- Hús  ö  nd  03:15, 28 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per Calton. Not a user in "good standing". Kimchi.sg 02:01, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per MER-C. - Mailer Diablo 16:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.