Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sillybillypiggy/Vandalism space

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 16:15, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

User:Sillybillypiggy/Vandalism space
Vandalism spaces are not consistant with User Page Guidelines. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 12:51, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Neutral-ish - This count seems to show that (s)he's made quite a few userspace edits. Would like to hear the user's comment before judging.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 15:10, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:DENY, UP, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:ENC. This page condones and encourages vandalism and does not contribute to building the encyclopedia so should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 02:25, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I am STRONGLY AGAINST the idea the vandalism spaces violate WP:DENY. Vandals don't actually get recognition by vandalising vandal spaces. Besides, he only way a vandal can get to know about these spaces is by looking at the userspace of a user who had reverted his edits. WP:ENC does not apply here per WP:NOTPAPER. As for WP:UP, vandalising is NOT 'Games, roleplaying sessions, secret pages and other things pertaining to "entertainment" rather than "writing an encyclopedia"'.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 06:11, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The links I provided above are all applicable: 1. WP:DENY applies; see WP:DENY: Making a big thing out of this issue [vandalism] just reinforces this behavior (see positive feedback). This vandalspace supports the notion that vandalism is acceptable on Wikipedia, thus encouraging vandalism to occur on other parts of Wikipedia. 2. WP:ENC says, "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia." This vandalspace does not contribute to building an encyclopedia. 3. WP:UP is applicable because this page provides a playground for vandals and even a constructive editor who wrote in his edit summary EPIC VANDALISM!!!. I have looked through the page history of User:Sillybillypiggy/Vandalism space and do not see how this gamepage contributes to "writing an encyclopedia". Cunard (talk) 21:24, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Why do you think keeping this page improves the encyclopedia? Cunard (talk) 21:24, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Because it helps build our community. Anyways arguments like this are not constructive like the one we had last time; since sillybillypiggy has not provided a valid rationale for keeping for a few days, I decide that this should be deleted.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 11:18, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Pages that encourage vandalism do not help build our community. Cunard (talk) 04:48, 10 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I would like to point out that a vandalism page is reccomended at the user page degsin centre.sillybillypiggytalk to me sign! 15:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * That is very surprising! After a look around, here it is... User page design center/Decor A check of the page history indicates it has been there quite a while (at least since 2006). This should be removed because WP:UP does not allow vandalism spaces. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 20:30, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I have removed the vandalspace section from User page design center/Decor and will watch the page to see if there is any pushback. It is one thing to have a vandalspace, but promoting vandalspaces on "design center" page is very unhelpful. sillybillypiggy: thanks for taking the trouble to mention that page. Johnuniq (talk) 02:26, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:DENY and WP:UP. Vandalspaces promote the idea that vandalism can be fun and is somewhat respected because users are honoring their "work". Johnuniq (talk) 02:26, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.