Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sim~enwiki/Dan and Mab's Furry Adventures

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. taking into account that SmokeyJoe changed his initial keep to a delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:40, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Sim~enwiki/Dan and Mab's Furry Adventures


WP:STALEDRAFT, has been around since 2010 with no improvements. User stopped editing in 2011. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * keep I can see 3 mentions in this book, though 2 I can't view. Suggests might be borderline notable. Also some of the sources look possibly reliable. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:54, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. STALEDRAFT is not per se a reason for deletion. At worst, use Inactive userpage blanked. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * So we're using this as a loophole to circumvent the fact that the article was AFD'd a while ago? "Oh, it's the exact same article that got nuked at AFD, but since it's in userspace now, we can keep it and pretty much treat it like it's an article"? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:26, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * What AfD? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 18:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Articles for deletion/Dan and Mab's Furry Adventures. The article was taken to DRV in 2010 and endorsed. It was then userfied in 2011, and nothing has happened since. It's clear that this is only being used to circumvent the AFD. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per the AfD. A decision at AfD makes all the difference. I presumed this was a never-tested topic. That AfD is not trivial to read as a rough consensus to delete, but that it was. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 19:13, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what you mean by "pretty much treat it like it's an article". There's a notice at the top which says it's not an article. It wasn't linked on Template:Furry comics, nor is it linked from List of succubi in fiction where the comic is mentioned. It doesn't show up on search engines; even Wikipedia's, unless you specifically search for it. It's only taking up editor time now because you raised it for deletion. There is no database saving from deleting it because deleted revisions are kept anyway. GreenReaper (talk) 18:06, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as it was deleted at AfD and moving it to abandoned userspace does not improve the project. Legacypac (talk) 06:30, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.