Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Skylightgirl/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: '''Page blanked (AfC tpl removed). User us also a vandalism only account.'''. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:07, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

User:Skylightgirl/sandbox


Test page submitted to AfC. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 00:35, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I usually just blank these in sandboxes Legacypac (talk) 00:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Keep Seems like the nomination is more trouble/work than the test page is worth. Will the user be less confused after this is deleted? —DIYeditor (talk) 00:56, 9 April 2018 (UTC) Edited 01:39, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Blank, or remove the AfC template, but do not delete.  This is a user's main sandbox, it is the place they are supposed to experiment in.  Deleting their tests would be confusing to them.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:10, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * That makes sense, but this user may or may not be a one-off contributor. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 01:21, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Why do you think that matters? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:35, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * One-off contributor plus meaningless draft nobody else can build on equals AfC page in limbo. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 02:20, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * AfC pages in limbo are commonplace. Please stop bringing them to MfD.  The are fine to sit there until G13 cleans them up.  It is reasonable to give an author 6 months to to turn it into something that you were not expecting.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:10, 9 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment - Blanking of drafts and sandboxes is disruptive unless there is a good reason for blanking. In this case there are no good reasons for anything, and so no reason to delete either.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, and give trouts to both the author, for submitting this to AFC, and the nominator, for submitting this to MFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - User:Jjjjjjdddddd This was indeed a one-off editor. It is a good idea, when an editor does something stupid like submitting a test to AFC, to check their edit history.  Sometimes it involves vandalism.  In this case, it did, but they haven't edited in the past three weeks.  Robert McClenon (talk) 01:05, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep and give them a  Bobherry   Talk   Edits  03:26, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.