Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Skyrob213


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Greeves (talk • contribs) 15:02, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

User:Skyrob213
personal essay Ironholds 13:23, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. This appears to be a long description of a fictional airport in a fictional city. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:00, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep "personal essay" is not a reason to delete something. At the very least, when a user is active still, leave a note on their talk page before going to MfD. -- Ned Scott 06:03, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually if you read wikipedia guidelines, personal essay is a reason, since wikipedia prohibits personal essays on userpages if on topics not related to the running of wikipedia. Ironho</b><b style="color:#696969">ld</b><b style="color:#000">s</b> 14:02, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 *  Comment  Delete. I did leave him a note on May 31, mostly regarding his other edits, but also mentioning his user page. One problem with his user page is that it's not really a personal essay in the normal sense, but a fictional Wikipedia article that could be confused with a real article. And his other edits have consisted largely of adding fictional/incorrect material to real airport articles. I had hoped he would respond to my May 31 note, but instead, he has continued to edit his user page with no comment, leading me to wonder about his intentions. I'd like to hear from him before weighing in on this MfD, but in the absence of a response I'm leaning toward delete. --MCB (talk) 07:13, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT, and also because some material appears to be copied and bundled from several sources, possible copyright violations. Cena rium  (talk)  13:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless reasonable explanation is offered from the user. User has done little editing outside the user page that wasn't reverted as vandalism.  Don't know what the goal is but am concerned about the confusion between real aviation related information and fictional. Professor marginalia (talk) 15:41, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The page has been re-activated as of 2008-06-15 15:22 UTC. Now what? HkCaGu (talk) 15:44, 15 June 2008 (UTC)