Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Slime Is a Honour

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  User blocked as sock and, as such, the page is kept for information regarding that investigation. Achowat (talk) 09:30, 16 December 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

User:Slime Is a Honour


Possible hoax. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:47, 14 December 2013 (UTC) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:47, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * This would certainly be speedy-able as an obvious hoax in mainspace, but we should probably give a little more leeway in userspace, such as having a word with the page-creator before nominating here. FWIW, if this channel did exists, it would be interesting, not to mention the obvious parallels between the Slimy Awards and the ArbCom election... Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:57, 14 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Good point about asking the creator first. I just posted at User talk:Slime Is a Honour asking for sources. I didn't know what to do with this one. I didn't want to speedy it because it may be real. Sorry nominating without first asking. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:02, 15 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Page is now deleted and replaced with socktag. (SPI) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:04, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.