Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sock7215/Forest 54

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 14:40, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

User:Sock7215/Forest 54
Apparent vanity page for a non-notable garage band where it appears now that apart from the page creator, another (new) editor has become involved where their only edits are to this page, and so there is no reason to keep this here. There are also no reliable sources to be found, so this fails WP:N, and WP:WEBHOST also applies here.  ArcAngel    (talk) ) 03:40, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

My band is absolutely not a "Non-Notable Garage Band". I'm sorry, but Wikipedia doesn't allow attacks on people, and that is definitely an attack on me and my band. It doesn't help you, me, my bandmates, or any random person to delete my page. It's not like there's a max number of pages Wikipedia can have! So it would be completely useless to delete it. I assure everyone who will read this before my page will be wrongfully and stupidly deleted, that there is no FALSE information on the page. When we're famous, I have "ArcAngel" to blame that I don't have a Wikipedia page for my band. So, if my page is not WRONGFULLY deleted I won't have to complain! If people think I'm attacking "ArcAngel", then re-read the Wikipedia guidelines, because I'm not. I'm simply saying it is the absolute WRONG decision to have the page deleted. Please don't make me say this again (Yeah I'm talking to you "ArcAngel"), Sock7215 (talk) 19:50, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Sock7215
 * My assertion was not an attack - it was a fact. The page will be RIGHTFULLY deleted because there are no sources to be found to establish the notability (please read that section because you clearly don't understand what Wikipedia is about) of the band.  Simply forming one does not automatically confer notability - it must be earned through coverage - of which I found none.  Having a website also does not establish notability.  While it is true that there is no limit to the amount of pages that can be on Wikipedia, it isn't a webhost to place any old page about any old thing.  I suggest you read the WP:NOTPAPER policy - it outlines the fact that your band isn't notable and also fails the verifiability policy.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 20:02, 1 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Clearly not yet notable as there are no reliable sources I can find to establish notability. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 20:31, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:UP and WP:NOTWEBHOST. WP:UP states (my bolding): Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion. The likelihood of the this band's becoming notable is slim. Previously speedy deleted at Forest 54, this unsourced page is solely composed of original research. I could also analyze the content in the article with regards to notability such as the band's label being owned by a band member but will not do so because (1) will likely take it personally as he did above when  called it a "garage band" and (2) the creator is young and unaccustomed to such commentary. Cunard (talk) 22:06, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note If this page is deleted, please make sure that File:Forest 54.jpg is also deleted. (currently no license) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:31, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:148739 1673216359974 1524376430 31639890 289489 n (2).jpg should be deleted as well per the lack of a license and per Protecting children's privacy and Requests for arbitration/Protecting children's privacy. Cunard (talk) 22:54, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I put an F3 tag on File:Forest 54.jpg and FYI, that is the 2nd instance of that file as re-uploaded it a day after the first instance was deleted.     ArcAngel    (talk) ) 22:59, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * OK I have deleted both images now, IAR that we dont wait for 7 days. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:32, 2 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a venue for promoting your band. MER-C 06:55, 3 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.