Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sofiane Merouani

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete - unsourced, BLP problems, user has not edited for over a year. JohnCD (talk) 19:29, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

User:Sofiane Merouani
Unsourced article masquerading as user page. As an unsourced bio of a person that includes full name and place of residence + purported info on their children, divorce, mental state, etc. it may be eligible for speedy per WP:BLPNAME. LuckyLouie (talk) 13:09, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Neutral - I'm not too sure about this one. Can you find anything else to convince me?  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 13:23, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Web sites such as "Ghost theory" "The Book Of Thoth" and "Prairie Ghosts" are not reliable sources to establish the subject's notability, and per WP:REDFLAG, facts sourced to them do not meet our standards for verifiability. Also we should discourage userspace that look like articles. - LuckyLouie (talk) 13:39, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment stars "UCLA parapsychologist Dr.Barry Taff" who's not only "renowned" but also "reknowned", and a ghost looking like Ernest Borgnine. This is stirring stuff! All it needs is a suitably skilled author. -- Hoary (talk) 14:38, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * And given all the ruckus in the attic, maybe Barry should have enlisted the aid of this guy. - LuckyLouie (talk) 15:17, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Try ZDNet and the NYT, AFP   among other major places missssspelling words. Collect (talk) 13:59, 6 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE, which states "While userpages and subpages can be used as a development ground for generating new content, this space is not intended to indefinitely archive your preferred version of disputed or previously deleted content or indefinitely archive permanent content that is meant to be part of the encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a free web host and private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion" (mine emphasized). Because this is an unsourced article in the userspace that contains sensitive information that may violate WP:BLP, and because WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE apply, this page should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 23:11, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.