Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sohamlive/Books

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:37, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

User:Sohamlive/Books
– (View MfD)



These are all pseudo-books, that is, book-like pages that are lists of articles with the usual headers for books, but not in book space, by User:Sohamlive. This editor has been inactive for nearly two years. The book functionality is problematic in book space. The only purpose of pseudo-books appears to be moving into book space. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:06, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Pseudo-books are actually the default option at Special:Book and are a good way for users to test them and get a custom book without putting books not fit for the book space. I have no issue with (soft) deleting user pages of longterm inactive users if there's nothing useful there, but it being a "pseudo-book" isn't a good rationale. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 17:21, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - These books have been abandoned by an inactive user, and books have technical problems and do not work very well anyway. The book functionality is problematic.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:24, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete All. Per nom; no need to keep this. Britishfinance (talk) 18:56, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete those that don't qualify for WP:CSD, per nom and, and speedy delete the rest per WP:CSD. Doug Mehus T · C  18:43, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.